Aryson PST Merge vs. Manual Import — Which Is Faster?Merging multiple Outlook PST (Personal Storage Table) files into a single file is a common task for administrators, consultants, and power users who need to consolidate mailboxes, reduce fragmentation, or prepare archives for migration. Two common approaches are using a dedicated tool like Aryson PST Merge and performing a manual import using Microsoft Outlook’s import functionality. This article compares both methods across speed, reliability, control, scalability, and real-world usability to answer the question: which is faster?
Quick summary
- If raw speed for bulk consolidation is the priority, Aryson PST Merge is generally faster.
- For one-off or small merges where tool installation isn’t possible, manual import can be acceptable but tends to be slower and more error-prone.
What each method does
Aryson PST Merge
Aryson PST Merge is a third-party utility designed specifically to combine multiple PST files. Typical features include:
- Batch selection of PST files
- Merging options (merge folders, join items, remove duplicates)
- Preserving folder hierarchy and metadata
- Handling of password-protected or ANSI/Unicode PST variants
- Filters by date/item type, and duplicate management
Manual Import (Outlook)
Manual import usually refers to using Microsoft Outlook’s built-in Import/Export wizard or dragging folders between opened PST files in Outlook’s interface. Common characteristics:
- Uses Outlook as the engine to open PSTs and copy items
- Manual folder-by-folder copying or running Import/Export repeatedly
- Limited duplicate handling and filter options
- Requires Outlook profile configured and enough local resources (disk, RAM)
Speed factors and bottlenecks
Several variables determine how fast either process completes:
- Number and size of PST files: more files and larger sizes increase time.
- File format: ANSI PSTs have a 2GB limit and can be more fragile; Unicode PSTs are larger but generally safer.
- Disk I/O and CPU: read/write speed of storage (HDD vs SSD), CPU cores, and available RAM affect throughput.
- Network location: PSTs on network shares are slower; local SSD is fastest.
- Outlook version and system load: manual import depends on Outlook’s responsiveness and add-ins.
- Duplicate checking and filtering: extra processing increases time.
Performance comparison
Below is a concise comparison of typical performance characteristics.
| Criterion | Aryson PST Merge | Manual Import (Outlook) |
|---|---|---|
| Bulk throughput (many large PSTs) | Faster — optimized for batch operations | Slower — manual steps and Outlook overhead |
| CPU/disk utilization | Efficient, configurable | Higher overhead in Outlook UI thread |
| Network handling | Can process local and network PSTs; best on local | Works but sluggish on network shares |
| Duplicate detection | Built-in, faster bulk dedupe | Manual/limited; slower and error-prone |
| Automation | Supports scripted/batch workflows | Minimal; mostly manual |
| Error handling and logs | Detailed logs, resume options | Limited; failures may require retries |
| Setup time | One-time tool install | No install if Outlook available, but manual setup per import |
Real-world scenarios
- Small job (1–3 PSTs, GB total): Manual import is convenient and the time difference is minimal.
- Medium job (5–20 PSTs, 5–50 GB): Aryson usually completes significantly faster due to batch processing and optimized I/O.
- Large job (20+ PSTs, 50+ GB): Aryson or similar tools outperform manual import by a wide margin; manual approach becomes cumbersome and more error-prone.
- Remote/networked PSTs: Both slow down, but Aryson’s ability to queue and retry makes it more efficient.
Reliability and data integrity
Speed is important, but data integrity is crucial.
- Aryson PST Merge: Designed to preserve metadata and folder structure; includes verification and logs. Good at handling corrupt or password-protected PSTs.
- Manual Import: Relies on Outlook’s import routines; may fail on corrupt PSTs and offers limited reporting. Human errors (wrong folder copy, missed items) are more likely.
Practical tips to maximize speed
- Work on a machine with SSD storage and sufficient RAM (16+ GB recommended for large jobs).
- Copy PSTs locally before merging; avoid network shares.
- Close unnecessary applications and disable heavy Outlook add-ins during manual imports.
- Use filtering and date ranges to reduce the volume of items processed when possible.
- Run merges during off-hours to avoid contention on shared systems.
Cost and administrative considerations
- Aryson PST Merge: Paid software (cost varies), but saves time for repeated or large-scale tasks. Licensing and support are additional benefits.
- Manual Import: No extra software cost if Outlook is available, but higher labor cost and longer durations can make it more expensive in practice for large projects.
Conclusion
For most consolidation projects—especially medium to large or repeated jobs—Aryson PST Merge is faster and more reliable than manual import. Manual import remains viable for occasional, small-scale tasks where installing third-party software isn’t desirable. If speed and predictable results matter, using a dedicated merging tool is the better choice.
Leave a Reply